 | Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibniz - 1890 - 690 pages
...not God. Nor is there any Difficult) in what is here alledged about Space having Parts. For Infinito Space is One, absolutely and essentially indivisible:...suppose it parted, and yet not parted at the same time. The Immensity or Omnipresence of God, is no more a dividing of his Substance into Parts; than... | |
 | Wolfhart Pannenberg - 1993 - 184 pages
...Dieu" (p. 363 n. 3). Clarke had answered to this: "Nor is there any Difficulty in what is here alleged about Space having Parts. For Infinite Space is one....Terms; because there must be Space in the Partition itself; which is to suppose it parted, and yet not parted at the same time" (p. 368 n. 3). Leibniz... | |
 | Wolfhart Pannenberg - 1991 - 536 pages
...philosophischen Schriften, VII, 360). 222. Clarke (cf. Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften, VII, 368): "Infinite Space is One, absolutely and essentially...Terms, because there must be Space in the Partition itself." Kant argued similarly in his discussion of space in the Critique of Pure Reason (§ A 23).... | |
 | Wolfhart Pannenberg - 1996 - 580 pages
...nota siguiente]. " S. CLARKE, en GWF LEIBNIZ, Die pltilos. Schriften (ed. de Gerhardt VII), 368: «... Infinite Space is One, absolutely and essentially indivisible: And to suppose it paned, is acontradiction in Terms; because there must be Space in the Partition itself» [trad. esp.... | |
 | Nick Huggett - 1999 - 292 pages
...God: and therefore infinite space, is not God. Nor is there any difficulty in what is here alleged about space having parts. For infinite space is one,...terms; because there must be space in the partition itself; which is to suppose it parted, and yet not parted at the same time. The immensity or omnipresence... | |
 | Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibniz, Samuel Clarke - 2000 - 132 pages
...God; and therefore infinite space is not God. Nor is there any difficulty in what is here advanced about space having parts. For infinite space is one,...terms, because there must be space in the partition itself, which is to suppose it parted and yet not parted at the same time.4' The immensity or omnipresence... | |
 | Marina Frasca-Spada - 2002 - 252 pages
...Reading the whole of Clarke's passage, though, shows that the situation is not quite as simple as that: Infinite space is one, absolutely and essentially...terms; because there must be space in the partition itself; which is to suppose it parted, and yet not parted at the same time [and this, as Clarke reminds... | |
 | Thomas M. Lennon, Robert J. Stainton - 2008 - 290 pages
...another, they are not separable even in thought, unlike the parts of matter. Thus he writes to Leibniz: For infinite space is one, absolutely and essentially...terms, because there must be space in the partition itself, which is to suppose it parted and yet not parted at the same time. (G VII 368/L 685) Parts... | |
 | Michael Futch - 2008 - 205 pages
...letter that space being a property of an "infinite and eternal being" raises no difficulties since space is "one, absolutely and essentially indivisible,...terms, because there must be space in the partition itself, which is to suppose it parted and not parted at the same time" (LC 3.3). This harkens back... | |
| |
Nor is there any difficulty in what is here alleged about space having parts. For infinite space is one, absolutely and essentially indivisible: and to suppose it parted, is a contradiction in terms; because there must be space in the partition itself;... 