 | Samuel Clarke - 1717 - 488 pages
...Infinite Space, is Imtnenfity : But Immenfity is »of G0<i/ .• And therefore Infinite Space, is «o£ God. Nor is there any Difficulty in what is here alledged about Space having Tarts. For Infinite Space is One, abfolutely and effentially indivifible : And to fuppofe it parted,... | |
 | 1824 - 600 pages
...taken away.* He had before remarked, (Third Reply, § 3.) that ' Space is not a * being, but a property or a consequence of the existence of a ' Being infinite and eternal : infinite space is immensity.' * Space and time,' he remarks, ' are quantities.' It is true that afterwards, in his Fifth Reply, he... | |
 | Samuel Greatheed, Daniel Parken, Theophilus Williams, Josiah Conder, Thomas Price, Jonathan Edwards Ryland, Edwin Paxton Hood - 1824 - 608 pages
...away.* He had before remarked, (Third Reply, § 3.) that ' Space is not ft ' being, but a property or a consequence of the existence of a ' Being infinite and eternal : infinite space is immensity.' ' Space and time,' he remarks, ' are quantities? It is true that afterwards, in his Fifth Reply, he... | |
 | Johann Eduard Erdmann - 1840 - 476 pages
...collection of papers etc. ^p. 47. Space is not a being, an eternal and infinite being, but a property or a consequence of the existence of a being infinite and eternal. Ibid. p. 77. Void space is not an attribute without a subject.... In all void space God is certainly... | |
 | William Honyman Gillespie - 1843 - 422 pages
...observes Clarke, " is not a Being, an " eternal and infinite Being, but a property, or a conse" quence of the existence of a Being infinite and eternal...." GOD : And therefore Infinite Space, is not GOD." Third Reply to Leibnitz, 3. Again. " Infinite Space, is nothing " else but abstract Immensity or Infinity... | |
 | Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibniz - 1890 - 690 pages
...prove that it was not real. 3. Space is not a Being, an eternal and infinite Being; bul a Poperty, or a consequence of the Existence of a Being infinite...therefore Infinite Space is not God. Nor is there any Difficult) in what is here alledged about Space having Parts. For Infinito Space is One, absolutely... | |
 | Edward Grant - 1981 - 484 pages
...is present in void space, Clarke produced a syllogism to convince us that infinite space is not God ("Infinite space, is immensity: but immensity is not God: and therefore infinite space, is not God").392 Here Clarke sought to repudiate the Spinozistic equation of space and God. Space is not equivalent... | |
 | Joseph Moreau - 292 pages
...Troisième Réponse..., § 3 : Space U not a Being, an eternal and infinité Being, but a property, or » consequence of the existence of a Being infinite and eternal. Infinite Space 1s Immensity, but Immensity i not God ; and therefore Infinite Space il not God. (Il n'en est pat moins... | |
 | Wolfhart Pannenberg - 1993 - 184 pages
...dominus." 45. Gerhardt, 7:368 n. 3: "Space is not a Being, an eternal and infinite Being, but a Property, or a consequence of the Existence of a Being infinite and eternal. Infinite Space is Immensity," Clarke answered here Leibniz's remark that the conception of space as real and absolute leads to great... | |
 | Nick Huggett - 1999 - 292 pages
...prove, that it was not real. 3. Space is not a being, an eternal and infinite being, but a property, or a consequence of the existence of a being infinite...not God. Nor is there any difficulty in what is here alleged about space having parts. For infinite space is one, absolutely and essentially indivisible:... | |
| |
Space is not a being, an eternal and infinite being, but a property, or a consequence of the existence of a being infinite and eternal. Infinite space, is immensity: but immensity is not God: and therefore infinite space, is not God. 
